Re:“Node.js is one of the worst things to happen to the soft...
by jtrtoo on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @03:06AM
(#12341917)
So shouldn't the only question ever be:
* Would we rather burn computing resources (i.e. on new threads) or calendar time+human resources (i.e. on code refactoring)?
Followed closely by:
* And does it even matter for our situation? (i.e. since for many situations getting every last drop of performance out of a system isn't the real obstacle; it's making it do something useful for the end-user or business)
Re:“Node.js is one of the worst things to happen to the soft...
by cookiecaper on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @04:05AM
(#12342113)
and let's not kid ourselves that anyone trying to get maximum performance out of anything would be running JavaScript. If you need max performance, you write C, and sometimes raw ASM.
Re:“Node.js is one of the worst things to happen to the soft...
by akamaozu on Thursday August 25, 2016 @05:14AM
(#12357756)
That's like saying if you aren't driving a Veyron you obviously don't care about speed so use a moped.
Re:“Node.js is one of the worst things to happen to the soft...
by formula1 on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @06:36AM
(#12342638)
Having a successful async paradime helps closer to bare metal by setting a standard for how things should work. Now you can likely find more asynchronous libraries that attempt to copy the functionality of something familiar than creating something completely fresh
If you're running a web server, you can handle another request, then come back to the first one when the data arrives.