News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by AnthonyMouse on Sunday August 21, 2016 @02:07AM (#12329644)
There is no bottom. The less things cost the less difference there is between having money and not.
Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by eropple on Sunday August 21, 2016 @05:35AM (#12330152)
Oh, there most certainly is a bottom. Uber being cheaper for more people doesn't make rent cheaper for the person who's had their income slashed--or for everyone else that you would blithely reduce.
Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by AnthonyMouse on Sunday August 21, 2016 @10:53AM (#12331111)
Obviously because Uber has nothing to do with housing. Are you asserting that there is no possible way for technology or government policy to make housing more affordable?