Re:U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, au...
by Thriptic on Friday August 19, 2016 @02:57PM
(#12322559)
Sadly directly funding basic research or even translational research is not nearly as popular politically as funding military research. Basic research is often deemed wasteful by the public.
Re:U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, au...
by monkmartinez on Friday August 19, 2016 @03:01PM
(#12322602)
> I find it curious that argument is never put forward.
Because the argument you're making isn't a good argument.
The perceived waste would just happen in a different "industrial complex" with the perception that security is now weaker. Right or wrong, perceptions are what they are.
Re:U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, au...
by gillygill on Friday August 19, 2016 @06:34PM
(#12324000)
> The perceived waste would just happen in a different "industrial complex"
But with significantly less waste of human life.
Re:U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, au...
by hellogoodbyeeee on Friday August 19, 2016 @03:07PM
(#12322645)
The US spends 57% more on military than France. France spends 36% less on their military than the US.
Your 44% doesn't really make sense.
Re:U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, au...
by josho on Friday August 19, 2016 @04:37PM
(#12323288)
The percentage difference between 2.1% and 3.3% is 44%.
Re:U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, au...
by hellogoodbyeeee on Friday August 19, 2016 @04:49PM
(#12323359)
That doesn't mean anything.
The rest of your points skirt the question. Spending on the military isn't supposed to be the driver for the economy or the engine for innovation, those are side benefits. If those really are the goals then the citizens should be demanding that money be spent directly to achieve those benefits. I find it curious that argument is never put forward.