News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by sanderjd on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:05AM (#12318061)
This is the worst comment I've read on HN in a long time. You extrapolate from some weird personal anecdotes to "women study ridiculous nonsense feel-good bullshit" and then ironically imply that sexism is not a problem. I suspect you'll be downvoted eventually (and be flabbergasted as to why) but I thought I'd drop a comment with my gut reaction to your post instead.
Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by tn13 on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:41AM (#12318179)
I think his statements can be supported by data too. Look at the gender distribution for CS programs in top colleges.

I think people who insist that 50% of developers should be women are nothing but sexist of high order who objectify as some number that needs to be bumped up. Women have different priorities than men. They prefer jobs that provide more security and more immune to gaps than jobs that require more attention. I don't understand why it is so hard for people to accept the simple fact that women have their own mind and preferences and it can be different than men ?

P.S. This is not to say there aren't gender issues in any industry. But I dont think it is as black and white as people make it out to be.

Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by jeffdavis on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:20AM (#12318119)
The comment may be wrong, but a LOT of people have similar ideas. This is your opportunity to educate, not punish with downvotes.

Punishing merely makes people afraid to tell you their ideas, which means they just go on believing them. How does that help?

Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by exit on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:12AM (#12318079)
ignoring the color added by "nonsense feel-good bullshit", are women underrepresented in STEM degrees?
Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by happyslobro on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:28AM (#12318133)
TE: under represented, SM: over represented, at my uni, anyway.

This whole thing is way overblown, imo. If, for some reason, far more women want to be doctors than engineers, then good for them. The last thing we need are grumpy doctors who treat their patients like machines, or bored engineers who make a special snowflake out of each server.

Imagine how ridiculous it would be, if when I was enrolling in uni, an advisor had said something along the lines of "Are you sure you wouldn't rather be a doctor? Because we need more male doctors, and the engineering fields are way over their quota for males. In 4 years, you might not be able to get a job in that field, unless you discover that you are actually a woman in a man's body."

Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by asdfologist on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:14AM (#12318089)
Are men underrepresented in non-STEM degrees?
Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by exit on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:25AM (#12318126)
quite possibly - i have no idea though :)

careers such as nursing, teaching, and (ironically given the op) human resources seem to be highly gendered towards women.

Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by AnthonyMouse on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:19AM (#12318110)
The answer to both questions is yes.
Re:Facebook’s Point System Fails to Close Diversity Gap by sanderjd on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:18AM (#12318108)
The relevant question is whether they are underrepresented in non-"nonsense feel-good bullshit" degrees. But then we would have to agree on a definition of that. Having no statistics handy, I suspect by my definition the answer would be "no", while by yours (which perhaps is just equivalent to STEM?) the answer would be "yes".