I've decided to stop interacting with Annatar, it's not worth the rage. Especially when he starts misrepresenting GNU/Linux technology that you are deeply into the development of (runC and containers in my case).

Part of engineering a good solution is being able to recognize when you are in knee deep, and that it's not the best solution, and ditch it. That's what turns a good engineer into a great one, because then she or he turns around and builds the solution. You might not believe the grandpa here, but you're in knee deep, if not deeper.

On a personal note, I'm happy that you've stopped interacting with me. Good luck.

Ah, my apologies for that: I did not realize that shoddy NFS software is due to my incompetence. I also apologize that I wasn't able to get something which kind-of worked in RHEL 5 to work in RHEL 6.5 because things which are completely unnecessary on UNIX (like worrying about separate portmapper service) and which were in userland are now suddenly in the kernel. But only for NFS 4. Because the documentation is actually unclear on whether that's the case for NFS 2 and 3. And because the NFS protocol specifies that client and the server should auto-negotiate which version they will use. Because of course the community can't figure out where what should be, so flux. Again.

I guess it's really snobby of me to except things which work on UNIX according to specification to behave the same way on Linux. Because Linux is cool. And it's great. And it has the biggest, bestest community. And because I don't appreciate just how great that is, instead being focused on getting work done with computers.

Now let's rehash inter-process communication again. Because it's fun rehashing things which work in other operating systems, over and over and over in Linux. Because Linux is cool like that.