Re:Intel Announces Knights Mill: A Xeon Phi for Deep Learning
by argonaut on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @08:02PM
(#12309482)
But being drop-in compatible means supporting CUDA or the CPU interface.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel Announces Knights Mill: A Xeon Phi for Deep Learning
by cs702 on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @08:06PM
(#12309503)
They could also contribute code to the most popular frameworks, instead of releasing forks like "Intel Caffe."[1]
Re:Intel Announces Knights Mill: A Xeon Phi for Deep Learning
by argonaut on Thursday August 18, 2016 @03:04AM
(#12310844)
Yes, but unless the framework authors maintain the contribution (possibly unlikely depending on the situation) they will have to keep maintaining those contributions.
Re:Intel Announces Knights Mill: A Xeon Phi for Deep Learning
by joe_the_user on Thursday August 18, 2016 @12:06AM
(#12310379)
Is there a problem with a system that's CUDA compatible?
CUDA seems to me like the only simple SIMD-type computing system that's fairly straightforward to program and understand at this point.
Drop-in CUDA compatibility seems like a good thing.