News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Aetna CEO Threatened Obamacare Pullout If Feds Opposed Hu... by jessaustin on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @04:28PM (#12308190)
Do you think that was as clear to the sponsors of the ACA as it was to you?
Re:Aetna CEO Threatened Obamacare Pullout If Feds Opposed Hu... by gozur88 on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @04:46PM (#12308330)
If by "sponsors" you mean the political leaders, then yes. They knew they were fudging the books. They explicitly abused the GAO ten year window to make it look like there would be enough money even though the wheels were due to start coming off after seven years.

They also had enough political experience to know getting the (delayed) more unpopular parts (like cuts in payments to doctors accepting Medicare, increases to penalties for people who don't buy insurance, and extra taxes for "Cadillac plans") might be too difficult to get through when the time came. That's why they were delayed.

I suppose I can give them enough benefit of the doubt to say many of them may have believed once the system was in place they could solve the problems by closing the gap with something something.

Re:Aetna CEO Threatened Obamacare Pullout If Feds Opposed Hu... by jessaustin on Thursday August 18, 2016 @08:14PM (#12317177)
"Sponsor" is a standard term with a widely accepted meaning when discussing Congress.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponsor_(legislative)

Re:Aetna CEO Threatened Obamacare Pullout If Feds Opposed Hu... by gozur88 on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:42AM (#12318181)
Yes, and it's a word with other meanings as well. That's the one I thought you meant, but I wasn't sure.