Re:The SEC has temporarily halted trading of Neuromama Ltd.
by infinite8s on Monday August 15, 2016 @09:29PM
(#12294886)
Why would Eve worry about being caught? Everything you've outlined is perfectly legal, and in fact was executed brilliantly by Porsche (http://www.reuters.com/article/us-volkswagen-idUSTRE49R3I920...) in 2008.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The SEC has temporarily halted trading of Neuromama Ltd.
by conistonwater on Monday August 15, 2016 @09:49PM
(#12294966)
> Although some short squeezes may occur naturally in the market, a scheme to manipulate the price or availability of stock in order to cause a short squeeze is illegal.
Re:The SEC has temporarily halted trading of Neuromama Ltd.
by kirubakaran on Monday August 15, 2016 @09:45PM
(#12294950)
executed brilliantly by Porsche
Didn't really work out for them in the end. They executed the short squeeze to acquire VW but they're owned by VW now.
http://www.automobilemag.com/news/porsche-and-volkswagen-wha...
Re:The SEC has temporarily halted trading of Neuromama Ltd.
by jschulenklopper on Tuesday August 16, 2016 @05:27AM
(#12296337)
There are two Porsche companies. Porsche AG (the car company) is controlled/owned by Volkswagen AG, but there's also Porsche SE (holding company). The latter controls a 50.7% majority of voting rights of Volkswagen AG, for 31% of share ownership. The families of Porsche-Piech own 50% of Porsche SE, but 100% of the voting rights.
Re:The SEC has temporarily halted trading of Neuromama Ltd.
by colechristensen on Monday August 15, 2016 @10:47PM
(#12295201)
TL;DR Banks stopped lending to Porsche before it could seal the deal because 2008 happened.
Re:The SEC has temporarily halted trading of Neuromama Ltd.
by kirubakaran on Tuesday August 16, 2016 @01:01AM
(#12295629)
And Angela Merkel herself dissuaded the sheikh from lending Porsche money!
Re:The SEC has temporarily halted trading of Neuromama Ltd.
by rtpg on Monday August 15, 2016 @10:17PM
(#12295093)
My understanding of securities law is that intent is 95%. If you're doing market manipulation "just to make money" (instead of, say, to buy a company? Not really sure) then it's illegal.