Re:Soros, the Open Society Foundations, and the Continued Po...
by lanevorockz on Monday August 15, 2016 @11:23AM
(#12291052)
Apart from paranoid in one side, you seem paranoid in the other. This case is almost a complete set of emails so it's unlikely it's a hack. Most probably a whistleblower, potentially Seth Rich.
Now the question, does it matter ? If the emails are legit it is the only thing that counts.
Re:Soros, the Open Society Foundations, and the Continued Po...
by igivanov on Monday August 15, 2016 @10:51AM
(#12290792)
"Who benefits?"
The hawkish neocon establishment, as can be easily observed.
"evidence"
You mean, "code with comments in Russian"? Then I presume if the comments had been in English, it would be evidence of a British involvement? Or maybe Australian?
Re:Soros, the Open Society Foundations, and the Continued Po...
by anjc on Monday August 15, 2016 @10:33AM
(#12290675)
So just to be clear, you have zero evidence to back up your assertion.
Re:Soros, the Open Society Foundations, and the Continued Po...
by lern_too_spel on Monday August 15, 2016 @12:23PM
(#12291456)
It wasn't his assertion. The user who made the assertion posted evidence that you can respond to if you like.
What I love most is how Obama is hated because he's a Muslim agent (despite literally zero evidence), but here's an actual agent of the former-USSR trying to steal an election and these guys are after Hillarys email management. Selective paranoia apparently.