News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by SatvikBeri on Sunday August 14, 2016 @02:48PM (#12286756)
I think this extends to jargon from scientific fields in general–e.g. "on the margin" from economics, "failure mode" from engineering, "significant" vs "substantial" (statistics), "system 1/system 2" (psychology), etc.
Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by hacker42 on Sunday August 14, 2016 @03:54PM (#12287047)
See also 100+ Concepts To Add To Your Cognitive Toolkit (including all comments): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10819355
Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by noonespecial on Sunday August 14, 2016 @07:06PM (#12287730)
Every discipline and even hobbyist/fan-group seems to have their own little “Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra”s.

See.

Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by adrianratnapala on Monday August 15, 2016 @01:15AM (#12288799)
This is true, but mathematical jargon is more broadly applicable. (Though at this level of detail I would roll stats in with probabilty and hence pretend it is part of maths).

I've been a physicist and am now a software engineer. I can use the maths based jargon in both those fields, but not vice versa.

That's partly because everyone in a STEM field had to learn at least some maths. But more importantly: maths is about the logical interconnection of things, while the things themselves are substitutable. So it is no suprise that its jargon can be applied in many fields.

Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by unexistance on Monday August 15, 2016 @01:33AM (#12288847)
https://xkcd.com/435/

Made me remember this. If only the 'upper' fields adopt mathematical naming where applicable :D

Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by yyhhsj0521 on Sunday August 14, 2016 @08:42PM (#12287981)
Just curious, what's the difference between significant and substantial?
Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by bunderbunder on Sunday August 14, 2016 @10:37PM (#12288323)
Significant, as in "statistically significant", usually that you've got sufficient evidence to conclude that your result is not simply due to random chance.

Substantial means that your result is big enough to have any practical import. In other words, is there any substance to the result?

For an example of a result that is significant but not substantial, suppose you find after surveying millions of people that members of demographic group X score 1/10 point higher than average on an IQ test.

For an example of a result that is substantial but not significant, sales figures are often so variable that it's impossible to determine with confidence whether even a 100% jump in revenues is due to a recent ad campaign or just a random fluke.

Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by dogmatix on Sunday August 14, 2016 @11:45PM (#12288514)
Significant - it matters. Substantial - of large magnitude.
Re:What is it like to understand advanced mathematics? by Aelinsaar on Sunday August 14, 2016 @04:00PM (#12287068)
Signal v. Noise is also priceless.