Re:Successfully collaborating with computational biologists
by jghn on Saturday August 13, 2016 @05:08PM
(#12283112)
Depends on where you are. At my company you generally need a Phd in something like CS, Math or Physics to even be considered.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Successfully collaborating with computational biologists
by apathy on Saturday August 13, 2016 @11:44PM
(#12284185)
You make it sound like that's a difficult thing to acquire.
But, as my dissertation adviser pointed out, "[apathy], you have to remember that Really Stupid People get PhDs all the time. Don't let me down."
Re:Successfully collaborating with computational biologists
by apathy on Saturday August 13, 2016 @11:46PM
(#12284191)
Also, I had a discussion with a theoretical physicist recently where we spent almost half an hour bemoaning the myriad ways in which experimental design was ignored in our (hard science) undergrad programs, as well as many if not most graduate programs. It's sad.
Re:Successfully collaborating with computational biologists
by jghn on Sunday August 14, 2016 @12:47AM
(#12284302)
It's above my intellect level. You miss the point however, I was responding to a point that biologists we're finding their way into comp bio roles without computational skills
Re:Successfully collaborating with computational biologists
by apathy on Sunday August 14, 2016 @12:54PM
(#12286300)
It's not above your intellect. That's the whole point. Credentials are mostly bullshit unless accompanied by primary evidence. Think for yourself first. If necessary, and only if necessary, feel free to use credentials as potential tiebreakers.
Having students (particularly mathematicians) has reminded me that only derivation and demonstration really count in science. All the rest is artifice.