Re:The brave new world of robots and lost jobs
by eli_gottlieb on Friday August 12, 2016 @09:10AM
(#12275286)
I mean, just to point out, if the way to avoid a doubled usage of resources is to kill a guy, you can always kill the employer and sack the management.
Or to be less flippant, this kind of reasoning only makes sense if you assume that the split of revenues between the state, the worker, and the employer overwhelmingly favors the worker and the state. That doesn't seem like a situation in which the employer chooses to hire someone at all, actually, so I'd consider it somewhat unlikely.
Or to be less flippant, this kind of reasoning only makes sense if you assume that the split of revenues between the state, the worker, and the employer overwhelmingly favors the worker and the state. That doesn't seem like a situation in which the employer chooses to hire someone at all, actually, so I'd consider it somewhat unlikely.