Cheap, fast, wireless connectivity won’t happen without more fiber

Re:Cheap, fast, wireless connectivity won’t happen without m... by bogomipz on Friday August 12, 2016 @06:34AM (#12274477)

Yes the "C" is for course and the "D" is for dense. All of the CWDM gear I have been exposed to was LEDs, generally actual lasers are much more expensive and you dont need that sensitivity for such loose banding. In what implementations is CWDM using lasers instead of LEDs?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cheap, fast, wireless connectivity won’t happen without m... by mrjoeblack on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:37AM (#12275082)

CWDM uses lasers too, the reduced wavelength tolerance simply means that the lasers can be uncooled (reducing the power draw) and that chirp (frequency shift during modulation) does not cause interference with neighbouring channels, making them easier to modulate directly. The 'loose' CWDM banding is actually smaller than the bandwidth of typical LEDs.

[ Parent | on HN ]