News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Universal Basic Income and the New Corporatist Democrats. Parent comment

Re:Universal Basic Income and the New Corporatist Democrats by gwright on Thursday August 11, 2016 @07:31PM (#12272454)
You are assuming a static system in which wealth transfer is a zero-sum game. Unfortunately that isn't the world we live in. It is entirely possible that administrative systems to transfer wealth could utterly destroy the economy (for example, Venezuela).

In particular I'm at a loss to understand the arguments for UBI that assume the system could/should provide a sufficient income for everyone to 'live' independent of any other source of income. How exactly would that work? Wouldn't the people actually working be just a bit unhappy being taxed to support people who didn't work at all? Wouldn't people on the margins simply stop working? Wouldn't this system drift into a completely unsustainable configuration?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal Basic Income and the New Corporatist Democrats by lastyearman on Friday August 12, 2016 @01:57AM (#12273624)
In Scandinavia everyone is already guaranteed a certain amount of income by law. If you can't get it by working, then it is provided by welfare. I don't see UBI being any different.

But you're right. I don't know how people in the US would react. Maybe they would see it as an evil tax from rich to poor and never accept it. However, I'm arguing that it doesn't have to come with any extra tax burden.

There is an UBI experiment starting in Finland in 2017. If it proves to be successful, then I have no doubt that it will be implemented elsewhere too.

[ Parent | on HN ]