Re:A New Wireless Hack Can Unlock 100M Volkswagens
by redcalx on Thursday August 11, 2016 @06:46PM
(#12272194)
1) Expected cost of failure = probability * cost given failure occurs. Many people will fail to correctly estimate expected cost when the probability is low but the cost number is high.
2) In this case the probability estimate was also wrong, i.e. lax security gives a P of a security failure of very nearly 1.0. (I suppose you could argue that the P estimates made were good based on the information available).
3) There are strong pressures suppressing the information flow coming from people who can and do correctly estimate the probability and costs. Basically they're typically dismissed as being OTT drama queens or oddballs. After all, fixing the problems is a real cost now, versus a possible cost in the future.
2) In this case the probability estimate was also wrong, i.e. lax security gives a P of a security failure of very nearly 1.0. (I suppose you could argue that the P estimates made were good based on the information available).
3) There are strong pressures suppressing the information flow coming from people who can and do correctly estimate the probability and costs. Basically they're typically dismissed as being OTT drama queens or oddballs. After all, fixing the problems is a real cost now, versus a possible cost in the future.
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurit...