News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zero-cost futures in Rust by pcwalton on Thursday August 11, 2016 @05:50PM (#12271846)
> You're talking about using a language where you have to manually manage the memory, is significantly harder to use than Go, have less built-in concurrent patterns, inferior standard library so yes 30% seems a very small as a benefit.

Naturally I disagree with all of those items, but I'm also equally uninterested in starting a Rust vs. Go war.

There are no comments on this comment yet.