News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft proves backdoor keys are a bad idea by rocqua on Wednesday August 10, 2016 @06:00PM (#12265036)
Perhaps not rate-limiting, but on the i-phone, it was about circumventing the limit of 10 tries.

Besides, doesn't secureboot block an unsigned live-CD? Otherwise, I don't see the point of secure boot past vendor lock-in.

Re:Microsoft proves backdoor keys are a bad idea by MichaelGG on Wednesday August 10, 2016 @06:39PM (#12265211)
It is supposed to prevent boot level malware or people otherwise compromising the device. Implemented correctly, it can be beneficial to security. As an end user, I like having a TPM, and I like having boot level protection measures. I wouldn't trust my life to them, but after seeing indictments/FBI testimony, they seem like they are enough to deter many attackers.

The whole "only applies to RT devices" was a bit shifty looking from MS, though. Fortunately the broken Windows on ARM model died.

Edit: I'd also note that, e.g. console gamers love this stuff. It allows them to pretty much rely on others not being able to cheat very well.

Re:Microsoft proves backdoor keys are a bad idea by rocqua on Wednesday August 10, 2016 @07:01PM (#12265299)
So does it validate the bios/uefi firmware? Which then in turn can be setup to validate the OS (or not to validate it?)