Re:More encryption means less privacy
by tvanantwerp on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @12:24PM
(#12255698)
I do IT for a think tank in DC. I've seen people across the political spectrum fail to enact their particular agenda for their entire multi-decade careers. Changing policy is slow and, quite often, impossible.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If only there was some way of contiuing policy through some other means...
That's the importance of technology (and arms).
Arms are now, and have been since the days before the ass' jawbone, just a kind of technology. I think increasingly the value lies in technology which doesn't have killing someone as its primary function. That's true for you and me, and it's true for a government that seems perpetually fascinated with "Less Lethal" options.
Electroshock devices have shown the world just how much people will take from their government, if it has almost no chance of killing or visibly scarring them.
Re:More encryption means less privacy
by jessaustin on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @01:58PM
(#12256482)
If one can enjoy a multi-decade career without making any changes, why worry about making changes?
Re:More encryption means less privacy
by michael_fine on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @02:54PM
(#12256924)
Because most political jobs pay abysmally, have little job security, and require painful working hours. As such, there aren't many reasons to go into politics beyond wanting to make a change.