News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Can NAT traversal be Tor's killer feature? (2014) by micaksica on Friday August 05, 2016 @07:13PM (#12236307)
Virtually everyone can run a relay.

BitTorrent is effectively a "relay" when you seed. The anonymity network I2P actually works in a way that you are both the relay and the client by default.

According to Tor, "decent" is 2Mb/sec symmetric, which most any broadband connection can do. I suspect everyone has 2MB/sec lying around. From Tor [1]:

The more people who run relays, the faster the Tor network will be. If you have at least 2 megabits/s for both upload and download, please help out Tor by configuring your Tor to be a relay too.

There are other ways to contribute to the project as well, such as running bridge relays [2]. These are often less-used but are necessary for the network to work well in places where it needs to be used for censorship circumvention.

You can also configure a browser to be a short-lived FlashProxy [3] bridge relay.

Even still, throttling bandwidth in your `torrc` means you can easily run a relay on a droplet or EC2 instance and not cost yourself a lot of money. There is also torservers.net [4] for hosting; they accept donations as well.

[1] https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-relay.html.en [2] https://www.torproject.org/docs/bridges.html.en [3] https://crypto.stanford.edu/flashproxy/ [4] https://www.torservers.net/

Re:Can NAT traversal be Tor's killer feature? (2014) by vermilingua on Saturday August 06, 2016 @05:07AM (#12237567)
Perhaps in Europe and the US, but here in Australia (and many other places I suspect), 2MB/s is a luxury. We have the NBN (partially) rolling out at the moment, but anything better than 12/1mbit will be largely inaccessible to the majority.