News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The curse of the gifted programmer (ESR's email to Torvalds) by ihodes on Friday March 26, 2010 @11:41PM (#1222534)
I've got to agree with jodrellblank's sentiment.

While the email was undoubtedly pretentious, I've got to say that ESR brings to light some really important points... at some point, systems that "mere mortals" use to keep track of a large code base become a necessity even for people like Linus.

I don't like how comments like these (even if they're from a user who normally has insightful/useful comments, albiet generally snarky) get voted so high up. It's time like these I wish I could vote down a response.

EDIT: Interesting to note for future readers: my comment was voted down at least once within 5 seconds (or less) of posting this.

Re:The curse of the gifted programmer (ESR's email to Torvalds) by thwarted on Saturday March 27, 2010 @12:00AM (#1222546)
Interesting to note for future readers: my comment was voted down at least once within 5 seconds (or less) of posting this.

Comments without content are timeless, they don't suddenly gain usefulness through age. Are you suggesting that if only someone had let your comment reach maturity, they would have been obligated to upvote it?

Re:The curse of the gifted programmer (ESR's email to Torvalds) by devinj on Saturday March 27, 2010 @04:12AM (#1222741)
I think he was suggesting his comment was downvoted after a reader read the first line or two.