Re:BitFinex down due to Bitcoin security breach - 120k BTC s...
by ikeboy on Wednesday August 03, 2016 @07:05AM
(#12217094)
But then a compromise of 2 and a zero day remote attack can exploit 1. 1 is offline so no attack not involving insiders can affect it.
Edit: actually nvm, didn't get the part about unidirectional. I don't deal with networking but I assume that's possible physically and there's no way to reverse the flow?
Re:BitFinex down due to Bitcoin security breach - 120k BTC s...
by ch on Wednesday August 03, 2016 @08:36AM
(#12217458)
Thats correct: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidirectional_network
Sometimes known as a Data Diode.
If I wanted to make a trustworthy rate limit, I'd have the machine from (1) not airgapped, but connected by a serial (unidirectional) line to the machine from (2) along which it would periodically send signed transactions sending some of the money from "lukewarm" storage to hot storage, and sending change back to the very same "lukewarm" storage address. The machine from (1) can then implement a rate limit.