News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Slow-motion replays can distort criminal responsibility by entropy_ on Tuesday August 02, 2016 @08:48AM (#12209520)
How violent an action truly is is irrelevant when deciding whether a murder was premeditated(first degree) or not(second degree). If I swing a hammer at a wall and someone happens to be passing by, I hit them in the face and kill them, it's going to look very gruesome in slow motion. That doesn't mean I intended to kill the person. If a jury is more likely to think I had time to notice the person passing by because of slow motion and thus believe that I intended to kill the person, then that's an error.
Re:Slow-motion replays can distort criminal responsibility by kevin_b_er on Tuesday August 02, 2016 @11:35AM (#12210702)
It doesn't even have to be a killing.

The slow motion makes it look like actions were deliberate instead of spontaneous. So it makes it look like a planned action. If the defendant deliberately did it, they must be pretty terrible, right? Guilty of a worse crime.

Re:Slow-motion replays can distort criminal responsibility by jsprogrammer on Tuesday August 02, 2016 @03:28PM (#12212607)
How often does spontaneous violence occur? If it looks like actions were deliberate and planned, wouldn't you need some other reasoning to believe that they weren't?
Re:Slow-motion replays can distort criminal responsibility by syk26 on Wednesday August 03, 2016 @09:10AM (#12217652)
Right, but the dangerous part is that slow motion biases our judgement so that we ultimately determine an action was deliberate and planned.