News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ... by pg on Friday March 26, 2010 @01:47AM (#1220355)
I'm sorry. Comments here used to be a lot more thoughtful (in both senses). I'm planning on working on this problem soon.
Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ... by blasdel on Friday March 26, 2010 @02:56AM (#1220437)
This particular link is a perfect troll — the headline stabs at your WTF button, then the comment linked to has zero context clarifying the reasoning but tons of technical details that fuel the nerd rage — people were so trolled by the perceived linkrot and cache problems that they didn't even bite at the obvious SQL & ORM bait!

I don't think you can fix this with code, much less your usual tactic of adding heuristics to moderate/voteweight/ban.

Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ... by caffeine on Friday March 26, 2010 @08:59AM (#1220858)
Not to be HN-litist, but I think this post is drawing questionable comments in particular because it's linked in several places from Reddit, from which we are likely receiving a flood of users uninclined to self-moderate.
Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ... by riffer on Saturday March 27, 2010 @11:03AM (#1223038)
I hope that one of the approaches you try is recursive on who tends to vote for whom.