I was criticizing the position stated in the top comment of this thread which stated:
>There is a large and (warranted) initiative to bank minorities and other disadvantaged communities. Until the government created huge incentives to do this it didn't happen.
I think it's important to distinguish between all banking services and credit facilities. I feel as though improving access to banking services in otherwise under-banked groups is an important initiative. ~30% of Americans do not have access to a savings account. Ensuring that all communities have access to these basic services would likely be beneficial to individuals and the economy. However, access to credit should be decoupled from such considerations.
That is a complete explanation in itself and it was not caused by the CRA legislation (it merely shared the same motivation). When you let mortgage brokers offload all the risk from writing stupid loans, you have altered all their incentives.
A cursory search yielded http://www.businessinsider.com/the-cra-debate-a-users-guide-...