Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ...
by latch on Thursday March 25, 2010 @04:04PM
(#1219348)
Their 404 page is 142KB...not huge, not small. Just sayin'
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ...
by joevandyk on Thursday March 25, 2010 @04:13PM
(#1219369)
Is all that HTML? Spiders generally only care about HTML -- they're not going to download the js and css and images and flash and whatever.
Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ...
by bluesmoon on Thursday March 25, 2010 @11:58PM
(#1220226)
8 years ago, maybe. Today all search engine spiders pull down and execute javascript & css as well just so that they can index a real user's experience.
Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ...
by code_duck on Friday March 26, 2010 @02:33AM
(#1220408)
The better ones may, but perhaps not for all pages. Generally, when viewing logs I see search engine spiders make a single request, for only the html content and not js or css.
Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ...
by latch on Thursday March 25, 2010 @06:30PM
(#1219711)
duh, I didn't think about that :) HTML is way smaller
Re:The Onion cut 66% of their bandwidth by upstream caching ...
by danudey on Thursday March 25, 2010 @04:50PM
(#1219466)
I got 48 KB of HTML, 110 KB of stylesheets, 59 KB of images, and 136 KB of Javascript. I'm curious how you got your 142 KB number. Do you mean after it's been gzipped?