News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paw – Advanced API tool for Mac by doomtop on Friday July 29, 2016 @06:02PM (#12190377)
Hypernap is a proper native app and less than a tenth the cost of Paw...

http://gethypernap.com/

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hypernap/id795069997

Re:Paw – Advanced API tool for Mac by developer2 on Saturday July 30, 2016 @01:46AM (#12191801)
Hypernap may be a native app, but it's certainly not beautiful or fully featured. It uses the most basic interface elements thrown together in a messy soup. I have immense respect for people who manage to develop native apps, but when the interface looks like it was implemented as someone's very first experiment in XCode... well, there's a reason you don't pay much.

I don't understand why developers throw their arms in the air over pricing. Try out the app; if it has everything you will ever need out of such a tool and it greatly improves your productivity every single day... a one-time $50 payment is nothing. It's the cost of going out for dinner one evening.

Re:Paw – Advanced API tool for Mac by andyfleming on Friday July 29, 2016 @06:17PM (#12190462)
But it isn't as nice and it doesn't have any solution for cloud/team syncing, right?
Re:Paw – Advanced API tool for Mac by doomtop on Friday July 29, 2016 @08:05PM (#12190940)
Commenter mentioned OSX native app being the main thing for them. It is an OSX native app.

But no, it's not a good team solution.

And I'd agree that Paw is subjectively more "nice", but I'm not sure I'd agree it's 12x more nice...

If it were $9.99 instead of $49.99, I would have already purchased it. As it stands, I'm sticking with Hypernap, which gets the job done for my needs.

Re:Paw – Advanced API tool for Mac by SwellJoe on Friday July 29, 2016 @09:56PM (#12191272)
It doesn't have to be 12x better. It only has to save you $45 worth of time more than a $5 alternative, or $50 more than a free alternative. Most engineers are paid on the order of $30-$150/hour, depending on whether full-time, contractor, level of experience, etc. So, it has to save about 1.5 hours over the alternatives to be worth the price.

I don't know if it does that, as I've never used it, and don't use macOS.

There are other things it could save instead of or in addition to time: Hassle, maybe it doesn't have any external dependencies or complicated setup; stress, maybe it works reliably while others are buggy and unreliable; etc.

Again, I don't know. And, I tend to choose OSS solutions, even when it costs me more time/hassle/stress. But, there's a number of reasons one might choose a more expensive tool that does roughly the same job as lower cost alternatives, and it might be the right economic decision to do so.