News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Should Not Accept Scientific Results That Have Not Bee... by avindroth on Friday July 29, 2016 @07:14AM (#12186051)
Perhaps those who are skeptical of the first research (and are losing money from it) should fund the replication research.

Incentive for corrupting the data seems high, however.

Re:We Should Not Accept Scientific Results That Have Not Bee... by bontoJR on Friday July 29, 2016 @10:14AM (#12186931)
This works for some "controversial" researches, which can be dismantled. What about successful (or apparently) ones which may lead to tons of $$$ in return? Is there any value to pay for a research which is going to prove someone else was right ending in making their wallets fatter?

Sorry for the informal language, but makes things a little bit more salty.

Re:We Should Not Accept Scientific Results That Have Not Bee... by avindroth on Saturday July 30, 2016 @10:58PM (#12195537)
If someone is making money from it, someone else is (most likely) losing money from it as well.

When the lightbulb was invented, Edison made lots of money, but I am sure candlemakers had plenty of incentive to fund research that hypothesized that lightbulbs emitted toxins.