Re:We Should Not Accept Scientific Results That Have Not Bee...
by seanmcdirmid on Friday July 29, 2016 @07:13AM
(#12186043)
Much of what we peer review is not real science, at least in its definition of applying the scientific method.
For example, much of computer "science" is not. Math maybe, engineering probably, design sometimes, but "science" is rarely done. BUT the science envy is there, especially post 1990s, and it is as confusing as heck when multiple definitions of "science" collide in a conference culture.
For example, much of computer "science" is not. Math maybe, engineering probably, design sometimes, but "science" is rarely done. BUT the science envy is there, especially post 1990s, and it is as confusing as heck when multiple definitions of "science" collide in a conference culture.
Yes I'm a researcher, no I'm not a scientist.