News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:My Interviews with Amazon by Bartweiss on Thursday July 28, 2016 @02:02PM (#12181919)
Absolutely. That's part of why I stressed that it didn't seem to be standard Amazon policy - it looked like some hiring agent had decided "No fraud on my watch!" and pushed through an aggressive policy to make it happen.

My complaint was that it seemed both ineffective (imagine candidates with the Big-O cheatsheet taped above their monitor) and obnoxious (I wasn't even going to talk to an employee until I jumped through a bunch of hoops). If you're going to be demanding (and uncommonly so), then security theater with no engagement with the candidate is a bad way to go.

Re:My Interviews with Amazon by superuser2 on Thursday July 28, 2016 @03:01PM (#12182360)
>imagine candidates with the Big-O cheatsheet taped above their monitor

You need some interesting mental gymnastics to explain why this is even a problem, given that they could easily have the same cheatsheet taped on their cubicle wall after getting the job.

Re:My Interviews with Amazon by Bartweiss on Thursday July 28, 2016 @03:58PM (#12182729)
That's true - this all assumes that the existing "no resources but a whiteboard" system is even worth reproducing.
Re:My Interviews with Amazon by serge2k on Thursday July 28, 2016 @03:49PM (#12182672)
and you don't have it during the onsite.