Re:GitHub was down
by typpytyper on Thursday July 28, 2016 @01:30AM
(#12178501)
Github was good while it lasted. Back to SourceForge.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GitHub was down
by antoineMoPa on Thursday July 28, 2016 @01:38AM
(#12178540)
Then if SF goes down we'll go back to emails & patches. Issues will be tracked with post-its & todo lists and communicated by voice.
I really wish we could get the community effects of github without github and have everyone self-hosting repos or even a fully distributed solution on top of something like IPFS.
Re:GitHub was down
by happyslobro on Thursday July 28, 2016 @04:34AM
(#12179064)
I am sorely tempted to just start tracking issues as YML or CSV + markdown files in an issues directory. That gets me all kinds of features that GH doesn't provide:
- offline issue management (bugs on a plane)
- issues associated with branches
- grep, awk, ack, sed
- all of the above, available to git hook scripts
The only thing he holding me back, is that I really want to get this right. This needs to become a standard, not "Dan's weird repo that no one understands".
It's not fossil-scm, but git-appraise restores some of the lost distributed'ness:
https://github.com/google/git-appraise
https://github.com/google/git-appraise-web
https://github.com/Nemo157/git-appraise-rs
And there's also http://jk.ozlabs.org/projects/patchwork/ (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/).
Let's just get rid of the darn computers already.
Re:GitHub was down
by AndyNemmity on Thursday July 28, 2016 @02:10AM
(#12178644)
I gave up and started posting to usenet.
Young blood here. Can we go further?
Re:GitHub was down
by wckronholm on Thursday July 28, 2016 @01:46AM
(#12178570)
There's only so far tin can and string will go.
Re:GitHub was down
by typpytyper on Thursday July 28, 2016 @01:54AM
(#12178600)
19 minutes and twelve pop-under ads later... I can't commit my changes until I punch the monkey and learn one weird trick to make my teeth whiter. Ah, the good old days.