Re:Some Silicon Valley Tech Workers Get Home Loans with No M...
by brebla on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @01:41PM
(#12174914)
The contingency period in the contract is parallel with the financing process. They are not intertwined - apart from the contract being contingent upon securing a loan. If the inefficiency results from compliance issues due to needing to rate, package, and sell the loan, then couldn't an enterprising banker market speed of closing and absorb moderately more risk by having the loan on his books for a few additional weeks? In a competitive market, cash offers (one less contingency, sure but also speedy closing) are preferred.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Some Silicon Valley Tech Workers Get Home Loans with No M...
by Domenic_S on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @03:28PM
(#12175812)
Speed is just not that important for most residential purchases. The most critical thing is ability to close, which is where cash excels. Predictability is #1 - given the choice between 80% chance to close in 10 days (remaining 20% the deal falls thru) or 99% chance to close in 30, almost everyone takes the latter, all else being equal. I just can't think of any situation where a turbo close gets you so many more deals that it's worth the extra risk as a lender.
On the other hand, people often pay extra for a lender that has a history of closing on-time.