News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Our statement on the results of the Jacob Appelbaum inves... by VonGuard on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @01:14PM (#12174609)
What, like an independent third party? Cause that's what they did.
Re:Our statement on the results of the Jacob Appelbaum inves... by Natsu on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @01:57PM (#12175096)
There was also this, which didn't get very widely reported: http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sop8ps

I don't know what the truth is here, but I can't trust anyone who won't make the investigation public by that very fact.

And just for the record, I have been severely sexually harassed, enough that the person responsible was fired. So it's not like I can't sympathize with victims of harassment. Yes, it really is uncomfortable facing them, but it's also the right thing to do.

EDIT: Not clear why this is so controversial, but that doesn't beget trust, either. But it's true and I'll stand by it.

Re:Our statement on the results of the Jacob Appelbaum inves... by robryk on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @02:34PM (#12175399)
Is it still an independent third party if they chose her and are paying her? This is normally enough to say that she has a conflict of interest.
Re:Our statement on the results of the Jacob Appelbaum inves... by tedunangst on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @03:29PM (#12175818)
Normally an independent investigator is paid regardless of their findings, and future business with other clients is dependent on maintaining a reputation for impartiality.