News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by mikekchar on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @06:13AM (#12171656)
If I said that apples were the cause of global warming and that to avoid catastrophe you had to avoid eating apples it wouldn't worry you nearly as much, would it? I mean apples are delicious, but they aren't worth the misery that extreme weather will inflict on us. There are also a lot of people who depend on apple production to make a living. We would have to find some way for them to transition to something else for the benefit of everyone. Everybody who enjoys apples today would suffer a bit, but most people could deal with the consequences pretty easily.

The problem is that carbon releasing, cheap energy is more delicious than apples. It is worth a lot more than apples and the people who control that energy are a lot more powerful than apple growers. But the solution is the same.

How would you convince people to stop eating apples? You could protest against the eating of apples. You could lobby for apple taxes. You could do many, many things, but to be honest I don't think you would be very successful.

If it were me, I think I would work very hard to eliminate apples from my life (at least as much as I could). I would work very hard to learn how to be happy without apples (or at least with a tiny amount of apples). Having learned how to be happy without apples, I would show my neighbours and friends how they can be happy without apples.

Because the thing is, you require a cultural change to get everyone going the same direction. And they won't do it unless they think it's going to be OK. Right now all they hear is death and destruction on one side, or a life of freezing poverty on the other side. Most of them are happy to believe the apple salesmen who tell them that the concept that apples change the climate is preposterous.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by corecoder on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @07:40AM (#12171972)
The problem is that most of your neighbours and friends would see you as the hippy idealist guy who gave up apples in vain, because while you don't use apples anymore, airplanes full of apples keep flying, apples factories and farms keep producing and consuming apples, and apples provider ads keep showing how cheap apples are. There's a sense of helplessness (learned helplessness, some would say), due to the perception that your efforts are pointless, as you are but a drop in the ocean.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by pmyjavec on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @08:02AM (#12172072)
The word hippy and the negative connotations associated with it are fascinating to me, it's amazing how western societies have created a negative connotation to describe a person who is probably more caring, conscious and alternate thinking than your average citizen. Basically a hippy is someone guilty of 'thought crime'.

It's an amazing device.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by r_smart on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @08:20AM (#12172157)
I used to hold an opinion of hippies similar to yours. Then 1. I watched the documentary on Woodstock and saw the disaster they made out of that place and 2. Spent a lot of time around my cousin and her friends when she was in art school. My conclusion was that hippies aren't any better or worse than other people. They suffer the same flaws as everyone else. The downside is that they seem to put forward this air of high-mindedness that rings pretty false to me.

And they have worse hygiene :)

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by colordrops on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @08:57AM (#12172332)
There are hippies and there are trend following hedonists. You are talking about the latter.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by r_smart on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @09:41AM (#12172629)
No true hippy?
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by colordrops on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @03:00PM (#12175608)
Whatever the semantics and supposed logical fallacy, there are multiple groups of people that are categorized by the mainstream as "hippies", even though some of them are opposite in many ways.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by r_smart on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @03:12PM (#12175687)
I was referring to Woodstock, largely considered the high-water mark in hippy culture and my experience with hippies in my personal life when I was close to the group. You decided neither of those groups are hippies, though I have no idea what criteria you used to make that determination, or why you think it's accurate.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by Declanomous on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @09:48AM (#12172695)
Well apparently the farmer that hosted Woodstock was genuinely appreciative for everyone coming out there, and came out and thanked everyone on the last day of the festival.

I agree with your sentiments overall though.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by r_smart on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @10:08AM (#12172866)
I'm just saying the movie shifted my perspective some.

Also, IIRC, he got on the stage and thanked them while it was still going on. Before he saw the mountain of trash they left on his property.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by JWLong on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @08:20AM (#12172156)
You're more than welcome to continue to be fascinated... and ineffective. Sometimes you need to come down from your moral highground to meet the enemy.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by pmyjavec on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @11:31AM (#12173615)
Thanks for validating my point :)
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by merpnderp on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @10:34AM (#12173089)
Or we would see climate change leaders of the world driving armadas of vehicles, flying legions of people to their conferences, living in mansions, using the carbon footprint of a medium sized city, all while preaching we, the little people, need to put on a sweater in the winter and sweat more in the summer.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by Scarblac on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @09:18AM (#12172452)
Which is why we need government action, it's the only way.

Unfortunately, many of the world's large countries are democracies, and it's hard to, say, ration meat consumption in them. It's too easy for power-seeking populist politicians to gather votes from people who like meat by telling them that sort of thing is nonsense and a left-wing conspiracy.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by pif on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @06:41AM (#12171763)
I up-voted you because I really appreciated the concept and the form, but...

> I would work very hard to learn how to be happy without apples (or at least with a tiny amount of apples).

The problem is: with no apples, you can't be as happy as with apples. At least, not until the others are enjoying their apples and share the negative sides with you. It's the usual tragedy of the common, when anybody could be happier if (and only if) everybody ate less apples.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by mikekchar on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @08:00AM (#12172059)
Actually, I can. Or perhaps not with no apples. But, I certainly use less apples... er energy... than I used to. By a lot, and I'm much happier.

Warning, past this point you may think I'm a lunatic. I really am trying to see what works and what doesn't work. I've been really surprised at how much stuff I really don't want once I've gotten rid of it.

I don't have a car. I hang my clothes on a line (I even went a year washing my clothes by hand, but my wife drew the line there ;-) ). I wash my dishes by hand. I have a 200W heater that I use for 4 hours a night in the winter (1 degree C). I have a small electric fan that I use for a similar time in the summer (35 degree C). I experience weather* (wow). I have LCD panel lights (which are incredibly awesome). My wife and I average no more than 1.5 kWh a day. Even though we pay about 40 cents per kWh, I can't remember when our bill exceeded the minimum charge (imposed by stupid-power-company-fees). I could go on and on. And the thing is, I really am happier as a result of what I'm doing.

Can everybody be as happy as me with as little as me? I'm not sure. Maybe somebody can do better. I hope so. But I keep seeing what I can do and showing it to others to see what they think. I think it's the only way.

* I use about $20 a year in charcoal in a hibachi in really cold weather. I work from home and don't heat the home. I try to heat me. However, below 5 degrees C is pretty hard on the health, so I really don't advise it. Above that is surprisingly doable. 10 degrees C is even pleasant.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by pif on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @08:21AM (#12172160)
> I really am happier as a result of what I'm doing.

I'm sincerely glad for you, but how much of your current happiness comes from the challenge that you posed yourself and you won? In other terms, how much effort are you putting every day in your (fully respectable) cause?

> Can everybody be as happy as me with as little as me? I'm not sure.

Me neither. It looks to me as you chose to be happier via ecology. Most people have already chosen how they wish to be happier, and giving up cheap energy is just a huge roadblock for them.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by RodericDay on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @10:24AM (#12173002)
> Most people have already chosen how they wish to be happier, and giving up cheap energy is just a huge roadblock for them.

this sounds like total resignation. how about challenging those people on their choices?

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by pif on Thursday July 28, 2016 @04:24AM (#12179028)
Are we talking about the same people who always buy the cheapest thing while complaining that jobs left abroad? Good luck with that!
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by mikekchar on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @11:38PM (#12178182)
I think the big thing that surprised me was that I put in less effort on average. The absolutely biggest thing was getting rid of the car. A car enables you to go 100 km out of your way and cram your life full of complicated stuff. I can't do that any more, so I am much more relaxed ;-)

Hanging the clothes is another interesting one. We wash the clothes every day in the morning. The washing machine uses surprisingly little energy (average load is 64 Wh according to the manual). Hanging the wash takes a couple of minutes before work. Taking them down and folding them another couple of minutes after work. If it's raining that day we dry them on a rack indoors (sometimes takes 2 days in the rainy season, but it doesn't bother me any!). This is just dramatically better than my old process of hanging around for 2 hours for my laundry to be done. Hanging the laundry keeps them from getting wrinkled. The clothes also last a lot longer. Again, I was amazed at how much better it really was. Even when I was washing clothes by hand, I could do both my wife's and my clothes in 10 minutes easily. Usually did it just before I took a shower. If something needed to soak, I soaked it while I was taking a shower. My wife didn't like it, though, because I'm not as delicate as the washing machine (i.e. it's a job that requires some skill) and since the washing machine is actually quite efficient, we scrapped that.

Again, I could go on for a long time, but you probably don't want to be bored by all the discoveries I've made over the years. Some things require learning some skills. Some things require learning some new processes. However, I have been pleasantly surprised at how little effort is required to have a dramatic improvement in life quality at the same time as reducing energy usage.

Some things are uncomfortable in my new life. Sometimes it's hot in the summer. I drink cool beer at dinner time. You have no idea how good it tastes. Sometimes it's cold in the winter. I lie in front of a sunny window like a cat in complete bliss. I eat cold noodles in the summer and hot stew in the winter. I walk for hours on end in the perfect weather of spring and fall. My life is just better. By a lot.

I don't really expect to convince you in this kind of forum and I wouldn't bother replying, but you seem to be curious even if you are understandably sceptical. It's a bit easier to convince people where I live (in Japan) that what I'm doing makes sense because most of it is already part of the traditional culture. My mother in law is in her mid 80s and has never used a heater or air conditioner in her life -- she thinks they are evil. And a lot of things would have to be done completely differently in other parts of the world. I'm from Canada and you can't do without heat when it is -30 degrees C.

I think the key thing is to just challenge the assumptions we make -- A car allows you to do more things, so it makes your life better. A heater makes you comfortable, so it makes your life happier. These things seem obvious, but at least in my experience they don't necessarily follow in practice.

Nobody will change what they are doing now unless it is part of their culture. The culture will not change unless people see other people enjoying something new. If you want to change the culture, change what you are doing now, find a way to enjoy it, show other people. It doesn't happen over night, but it can happen more quickly than you might imagine. Just look at pedestrian city centres in Europe (would anyone agree to let cars drive on the high streets of England any more? I seriously doubt it). Look at people carrying cloth bags to grocery stores. In some places people would rather walk into a store without their pants than without their own bag. Neither of these things were remotely true when I was a child. Things change in surprising ways.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by pif on Thursday July 28, 2016 @04:27AM (#12179042)
Thanks for your reply! I don't share some of your opinions, but I appreciate your coherence. Up-vote ;-)
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by zafka on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @08:12AM (#12172123)
I really appreciate what you are doing. Did you have to coax your wife along this path, or was she already of a similar mind?
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by mikekchar on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @11:47PM (#12178201)
From my perspective, my wife has even crazier ideas than I do :-). Not to be dismissive of anyone's beliefs, but she is quite religious and I am rather opposed to religion on principle. She introduced me to many wonderful people from her church and I really enjoy their company. I will never be religious myself, though.

In the same way, she thinks I am a complete crazy person with this stuff. She doesn't agree with all of my ideas, but she enjoys the ones that work out. She supports me in trying to find the ones that work, just as I support her in being involved in her church activities.

She's Japanese and I'm Canadian and when we met neither of us spoke their other's language particularly well. It's always been a relationship where we need to work hard to understand each other and where we are surprised by the other's view point once we finally understand it. It's part of the charm ;-)

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by CWuestefeld on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @09:52AM (#12172718)
How would you convince people to stop eating apples?

One step in the right direction would be to stop (literally!) fighting to make apples as inexpensive as possible. We could allow the market for apples reflect the true costs of their discovery, harvesting, processing, and transport, with no subsidies.

The price would likely be significantly higher, and many people would curtail their apple consumption of their own accord.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by HerpDerpLerp on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @06:22AM (#12171695)
A confounding factor is that there is apples in a lot of things you may not think of, and somethings use apples in their production... even if you never see the apples yourself.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by madaxe_again on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @06:41AM (#12171760)
And even some products which supposedly provide free apples are made with apples, and require themselves to be used beyond their serviceable lifetime to provide more apples than went into making them.

In short, we either need a radical new source of apples, or we need to find a way to use far fewer apples.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by pif on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @06:45AM (#12171781)
> we either need a radical new source of apples, or we need to find a way to use far fewer apples.

I'm afraid that in no way we can have the second without the first one. People switched to fossil fuels because life was way too much easier with them, and no climate change can convince us to go back unless we find another big source of cheap energy or, simply, we exhaust the oil fields.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by madaxe_again on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @06:55AM (#12171822)
We basically need portable fusion, or micro-hydrogen turbines powered by hydrogen formed by electrolysis of seawater from purely renewable sources. It's quite an ask, given that, as you say, fossil is cheap and easy - although not as cheap as it used to be to get at - but artificially cheap on the market in a (in my view) desperate lunge to stave off the inevitable fall, as their real production costs catch up with them. There's a reason they're investing increasingly in "alternative" energy sources, and moving branding towards energy from fossil fuels. The market will act, but I fear too late.
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by pilom on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @12:22PM (#12174132)
Pulling away from the metaphor for a moment, I was under the impression that with today's technology (not the panels of 20 years ago), solar panels take about 4 years to produce as much power as it took to manufacture them and then service lives of 25 years minimum. I'm honestly curious, do you have a source?
Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by madaxe_again on Saturday July 30, 2016 @08:10AM (#12192639)
Most of today's renewable technologies have decent energy buy-back times - this is in part due to improvements in materials, and in part due to manufacturing infrastructure energy investment being paid off - and of course the increasing use of renewable energy for the manufacture of renewable energy production goods.

That all said, a lot of what is currently installed will probably never see energy buy-back. Rather, we have to look upon a lot of existing renewable investment as just that - investment - for this has paved the way for actually energy positive renewable energy technology, which we now have, and seem poised to squander.

Re:Scientists caught off-guard by record temperatures linked... by guard-of-terra on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @09:23AM (#12172486)
"misery that extreme weather will inflict on us"

This misery will be very unevenly distributed. Most people will trade one weather for another. Some will definitely benefit. A good portion will probably see their current place uninhabitable.