Re:UK surveillance bill includes powers to limit end-to-end ...
by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Monday July 25, 2016 @04:33PM
(#12161424)
> Even if it's not a problem today (in your opinion), then either that trend has to be reversed or it will become a problem at some point.
Just because some number has increased, that doesn't say anything about whether it will increase further, and if so, at which rate. So: How do you know there is a trend in the first place?
Re:UK surveillance bill includes powers to limit end-to-end ...
by vehementi on Monday July 25, 2016 @05:55PM
(#12161902)
Nor do we know if it has reached the level of "problem" or not. Murders could be up 100% but if it's from "negligible" to "negiligible x2" then it is not "clearly a problem".
Just because some number has increased, that doesn't say anything about whether it will increase further, and if so, at which rate. So: How do you know there is a trend in the first place?