Re:An event bus framework for event driven programming
by lnanek2 on Monday July 25, 2016 @01:59PM
(#12160361)
Yes, that's pretty full of boilerplate, even for Java, which is notoriously boilerplate.
There are more established event buses in Android with simpler syntax, like greenrobot's: EventBus.getInstance().post(new LogEvent("v1", "v2"));
Seen here: http://greenrobot.org/eventbus/documentation/how-to-get-star...
You can have multiple event buses and other customization there as needed, but you have sensible defaults to keep code small most of the time too.
Square also has one called Otto. If you want a lot of syntax and Java rather than Android, you might as well go full streaming with the RxJava library.
Re:An event bus framework for event driven programming
by V-2 on Monday July 25, 2016 @02:06PM
(#12160401)
I think Otto is a fork, and simply an enhanced implementation of Guava's built-in EventBus
Re:An event bus framework for event driven programming
by ttam on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @09:23PM
(#12169914)
meanwhile Otto has become deprecated and the authors suggest going with RxAndroid
Re:An event bus framework for event driven programming
by hitr on Monday July 25, 2016 @01:57PM
(#12160347)
With event framework,we should use little helper function to wrap each event type,at least that's what I have seen.Windows event tracing(ETW) comes to mind,one of the complex api written[1].I always thought that every application should make use of ETW infrastrucutre. Compared to perf_events or may be lttng in linux(I am not sure how difficult to integrate to perf_events).Currently there are good and easy framework for ETW in .net [2]. But once you integrate your app,your app suddenly gains performance tuning,debugging capability easily. I think this should hold true for any event framework!!
[1]https://mollyrocket.com/casey/stream_0029.html [2]https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Diagnostics.Tracing...
Re:An event bus framework for event driven programming
by zer0gravity on Monday July 25, 2016 @02:03PM
(#12160387)
Well, to be really fair compare it with :
if(logger.isDebugEnabled()){
logger.debug("...");
}
And yeah, it requires a bit more typting if you want to enforce a certain event format and want to add more parameters. But you only do that once, and I'd say you gain much more for your effort.
Re:An event bus framework for event driven programming
by CHY872 on Monday July 25, 2016 @06:27PM
(#12162075)
Fyi, intended usage with most Java loggers is to just call
logger.debug("...");
and ignore the conditional. If `!logger.isDebugEnabled` then the logger will ignore the message, so it avoids boilerplate.
Re:An event bus framework for event driven programming
by zer0gravity on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @12:53AM
(#12163409)
You want to wrap it in an if in order to avoid doing extra work ( like string concatenation or whatever ) and save some computation. It's to improve performance when logging is not enabled.
Re:An event bus framework for event driven programming
by jestar_jokin on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @12:57AM
(#12163422)
No good if you're computing the message somehow. e.g.
logger.debug(generateSomethingLarge());
It needs a more compact API.