News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Emacs 25.1 RC1 by massysett on Monday July 25, 2016 @09:30AM (#12158513)
Emacs has frames (aka "windows" for non-Emacs lingo) so there is no theoretical reason it couldn't have tabs. I understand the complaint about tabs. In Vim I have the opposite complaint: no frames.

Tabs can work in a terminal; Vim has them.

If I were an Emacs developer I wouldn't bother with tabs because we already have frames, but there's nothing non-Emacsy about tabs.

Re:Emacs 25.1 RC1 by gpderetta on Monday July 25, 2016 @11:16AM (#12159230)
It could work well if tabs contained frames instead of buffers, i.e. as a sort of workspace management. I guess this could be done right now by using a tabbed window manager.
Re:Emacs 25.1 RC1 by stinkytaco on Monday July 25, 2016 @11:32AM (#12159339)
I actually think it could work well if you could choose one or the other. aquamacs outlines the paradigm that I would generally use (frames usually equal buffers, but a tab can contain two buffers in necessary, like you often do in org-mode). I'm glad emacs doesn't ship with a tab paradigm by default, but it's easy enough to add one if you need.