News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Functional Programming Jargon by whorleater on Sunday July 24, 2016 @03:27PM (#12154444)
Pinyin's existence is as a stepping stone, and misses out on a lot of interplay between words. Pinyin negates how you can separate Chinese characters into different symbols, such as the Chinese character '鮮' ('xiān' in pinyin), is the combination of '魚' ('yú') and '羊' ('yáng'). It's certainly not impossible to learn Chinese through pinyin, but it would be an odd choice.
Re:Functional Programming Jargon by DeadReckoning on Sunday July 24, 2016 @10:08PM (#12156035)
It's not an odd choice. I've never heard of anyone learning Chinese as a second language who doesn't use pinyin at least for the first few years.
Re:Functional Programming Jargon by GFK_of_xmaspast on Sunday July 24, 2016 @10:47PM (#12156145)
I'm not convinced that there are enough hanzi that decompose nicely like that to make up for all the other issues.
Re:Functional Programming Jargon by 208Gi on Sunday July 24, 2016 @04:51PM (#12154832)
Pinyin doesn't negate Chinese characters. It's just tackling another issue - sounds and tones.