Re:Racket v6.6
by reikonomusha on Sunday July 24, 2016 @01:53PM
(#12154037)
In what way was Common Lisp a "dump"?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Racket v6.6
by dschiptsov on Monday July 25, 2016 @01:41AM
(#12156708)
Obviously by incorporating many pieces from various dialects without proper, careful unification in naming, ordering of arguments, eliminating redundancy, etc.
The examples of good care taken are library/base of Haskell (they really do rewrite core libraries when they have implemented a better idiom) and stdlib of Erlang and Racket.