News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wire open-sourced by qznc on Saturday July 23, 2016 @03:09AM (#12148674)
So, Signal plus video chat?
Re:Wire open-sourced by stemuk on Saturday July 23, 2016 @03:11AM (#12148680)
Probably not, scince Signal doesn't really support secure web communication (without phone routing).
Re:Wire open-sourced by lorenzhs on Saturday July 23, 2016 @03:19AM (#12148694)
This phone routing story keeps getting repeated here but it's not true and never was. The devices share a key but are completely independent. You can easily try it, put your phone into airplane mode and Signal-Desktop works just the same.
Re:Wire open-sourced by nxzero on Saturday July 23, 2016 @12:44PM (#12150040)
Issue may not be the routing, but that a mobile device is required to create an account.

Are you saying that the Signal Protocol created Open Whisper Systems, which is lead by Moxie Marlinspike, does not require a phone number to work? (Say the Signal Protocol instead of the browser extension since the browser extension uses the protocol to work.)

Re:Wire open-sourced by lorenzhs on Saturday July 23, 2016 @07:17PM (#12151442)
As far as I'm aware the protocol can use other identifiers. If I remember correctly the development server allows registering without a phone number for easier testing of Signal-Desktop. Not sure what is used as an identifier instead. Not sure where I read it, so it may be the result of the telephone game. Take this with a grain of salt.
Re:Wire open-sourced by vemy on Saturday July 23, 2016 @03:53AM (#12148758)
Signal also doesn't have a true desktop application. I don't want to install Chrome just to use a messenger.
Re:Wire open-sourced by woah on Saturday July 23, 2016 @03:18AM (#12148693)
What do you mean? Are you objecting to the phone number used as username?
Re:Wire open-sourced by nxzero on Saturday July 23, 2016 @12:53PM (#12150071)
It's not just a phone number, but also the IMEI. And the objection is that the service makes it (intential) very hard to use it anonymously.