News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why is censorship rampant on HN? by jacquesm on Friday July 22, 2016 @02:59PM (#12145871)
Ongoing terror attacks get flagged, not censored because they are 'normal news'. I personally don't flag those and don't agree with those that do the flagging because there are lots of other 'local news' stories such as stories about BART (the public transport) that only appeal to a small portiton of HN (it is essentially local news) that do make it to the homepage but strictly following the guidelines neither of those belongs on HN.

As for anything critical of the gpl, do you have an example of what you mean?

> while not turning this into a reddit kind of non-evidence based banter.

Indeed.

> Ask HN: Why is censorship rampant on HN?

That title also presumes that censorship is rampant on HN, it isn't. It may be in your view but that's just your opinion.

Re:Ask HN: Why is censorship rampant on HN? by PaulHoule on Friday July 22, 2016 @03:09PM (#12145946)
Also ongoing terror attacks are not a good subject in a lot of ways.

I remember when redditors decided they were going to "solve" the boston bombing and they just ended up harassing innocent people and distracting law enforcement.

It is like the stupid idea that people are going to fight terrorists with handguns. Really when the shooting starts you don't know what the hell is going on and if you see some guy with a gun you are going to think they are the shooter and maybe they are just somebody like you who wants to help.

For instance when Gabrielle Giffords got shot, the hero who wrested the gun away from the shooter when he was reloading was holding the gun so he could keep it away from the shooter and then somebody showed up with a gun and demanded that he drop the gun, and they argued about this. Here you had people who were trying to do the right things and did not know the facts and could have added to the tragedy. I think of that crazy scene were a bunch of wastoids were shooting at each other in Waco.

You don't want to be part of that either in real life or cyber life.

Re:Ask HN: Why is censorship rampant on HN? by jacquesm on Friday July 22, 2016 @03:11PM (#12145962)
Something like that happened the other day with the police shooting someone giving aid to another person.

Weird world we live in.

http://www.wcnc.com/news/attorney-cop-said-he-didnt-know-why...

Re:Ask HN: Why is censorship rampant on HN? by PaulHoule on Friday July 22, 2016 @03:32PM (#12146155)
Yes, for all the problems of racism, militarization of police, etc. the nature of the job is that police officers have to make split second decisions that can have awful consequences.

It is hard enough when the people involved are trained professional gunfighters, but even worse when it is just some average person who decides to pack a piece. There you are dealing just with competence at actual gun fighting, but even people who are so bad at just operating a gun that they shoot themselves on the way home from a gun safety class.

(Oddly, the first thing I learned about gun safety is go to the range, load the gun there, shoot all the bullets, don't carry or leave a loaded gun around)

Re:Ask HN: Why is censorship rampant on HN? by frik on Friday July 22, 2016 @03:06PM (#12145921)
Full live coverage on CNN, BBC World and Al Jazeera should be evident enough that this is not a misc "local news". I dislike this downvoting/flagging and think the site could work fine with just public up-voting.
Re:Ask HN: Why is censorship rampant on HN? by JshWright on Friday July 22, 2016 @03:08PM (#12145940)
You are conflating two things... Terror attacks are "normal news" (as you say, they're already covered by a wide range of normal media outlets). The "local news" comment was referencing things like stories specific to BART, a very regional mass transit system.