News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reddit is still in turmoil by imh on Thursday July 21, 2016 @09:34PM (#12141184)
>Incentivize for the behavior you want.

This isn't as straightforward as it seems. It's kind of like that old quote, "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." If the behavior you want is there because people are just casually messing around for fake internet points, it will change when you compensate them. It's probably possible, but far from simple.

Re:Reddit is still in turmoil by jsemrau on Friday July 22, 2016 @02:18AM (#12142000)
Well you manage the number. If your target is a high number of internet points your post will aim to maximize that.
Re:Reddit is still in turmoil by erichocean on Thursday July 21, 2016 @10:10PM (#12141305)
[DELETED]
Re:Reddit is still in turmoil by imh on Thursday July 21, 2016 @10:52PM (#12141446)
You could say it more formally as, "Many variables correlated to outcomes you want are not causes of those outcomes. When you intervene and change those variables, they cease to be correlated to the outcomes," but it's a bit verbose[0]. I've always read it to be not about measuring things, but about optimizing the wrong thing, because people will game the system. The concept is valid. What's your concern?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law#Expressions Turns out the original formulation was "Any observed statistical regularity will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes."