News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Strange Politics of Peter Thiel, Trump’s Most Unlikel... by oldmanjay on Thursday July 21, 2016 @03:37PM (#12139439)
Since there isn't even a Muslim race, all these claims of racism just seem to me like desperate heavings from people who hate dictionaries and love manipulating emotions.

Also, your last sentence effectively means "since racism is a thing, all accusations of racism are valid" which is almost offensively wrong.

Re:The Strange Politics of Peter Thiel, Trump’s Most Unlikel... by somebehemoth on Thursday July 21, 2016 @04:59PM (#12140028)
You are being pedantic. Most Muslim's are non-white. It is implicitly racist to suggest we ban all Muslim's from the US.

My last sentence suggests we have a major problem with race relations in the US. You can twist my words however you want but it doesn't change that fact. The entire concept of a "race card" was manufactured to belittle legitimate claims of racism. Creating a term to discredit legitimate questions of racism is offensively wrong.

Re:The Strange Politics of Peter Thiel, Trump’s Most Unlikel... by douche on Thursday July 21, 2016 @03:51PM (#12139542)
The racist label is interesting, I don't understand why that's the one that people reflexively reach for, especially when you could more accurately say that he is a bigot.

Bigot is more fun to say, plus it doesn't turn into an -ism when used in the adjective form. Because we have enough -isms.

Re:The Strange Politics of Peter Thiel, Trump’s Most Unlikel... by JabavuAdams on Saturday July 23, 2016 @01:21PM (#12150174)
This is a very weak argument that I see too frequently. Simply replace the word "racist" with the word "bigoted". It's no better to be a bigot than to be a racist so the complaint still stands.