Re:The Strange Politics of Peter Thiel, Trump’s Most Unlikel...
by somebehemoth on Thursday July 21, 2016 @04:59PM
(#12140028)
You are being pedantic. Most Muslim's are non-white. It is implicitly racist to suggest we ban all Muslim's from the US.
My last sentence suggests we have a major problem with race relations in the US. You can twist my words however you want but it doesn't change that fact. The entire concept of a "race card" was manufactured to belittle legitimate claims of racism. Creating a term to discredit legitimate questions of racism is offensively wrong.
Re:The Strange Politics of Peter Thiel, Trump’s Most Unlikel...
by douche on Thursday July 21, 2016 @03:51PM
(#12139542)
The racist label is interesting, I don't understand why that's the one that people reflexively reach for, especially when you could more accurately say that he is a bigot.
Bigot is more fun to say, plus it doesn't turn into an -ism when used in the adjective form. Because we have enough -isms.
Re:The Strange Politics of Peter Thiel, Trump’s Most Unlikel...
by JabavuAdams on Saturday July 23, 2016 @01:21PM
(#12150174)
This is a very weak argument that I see too frequently. Simply replace the word "racist" with the word "bigoted". It's no better to be a bigot than to be a racist so the complaint still stands.
Also, your last sentence effectively means "since racism is a thing, all accusations of racism are valid" which is almost offensively wrong.