Buyers of premium cars expect details that are expensive to manufacture. That doesn't necessarily mean that it has to be difficult to manufacture them or that the productivity has to be low.

I do. It just doesn't mean it's true or necessarily a requirement. Nor does it mean the car is better.

A better locksmith takes less time to open a door.

Did you just utilize an analogy concerning destruction to make a point about production?

Did you just use the word utilize to make your argument sound more coherent?

I utilize comment sections to keep my writing and argumentative faculties sharp. This is not how I'd normally communicate. I don't care about karma.

Yes. I can find another analogy if you like, but the message is the same.

Do you think locksmiths destroy the locks they open?

No. That phrasing was more pithy. Not wholly inaccurate if you think in the abstract, however.