I grew up in a small but nice suburban town about 20 miles outside of Chicago. Plenty of my friends are buying 3-4br houses in decent parts of Chicago for 250-350k. So maybe I just grew up in a "cheap" global city and am not used to what, say, Parisians have come to expect. I think it's just worse in the Bay Area.
For obvious reasons, prices scale with proximity to population centers and higher paying jobs. CA is a big place and encompasses a few very different regions. If you want to live in say, Coalinga (which I just found through a map) in the Central Valley, I'm seeing houses on Zillow in the low $100k's and below.
But, to what's likely your point, in SF and the surrounding metro area, even starter homes are well out of the reach of most of the people that live there. Hell, starter homes here are out of the reach of a good percentage of people, and it's not nearly as bad as farther South.
This has been completely normal in many/most major world cities/regions for generations. That's why there's a term for a first home. I don't understand the consternation.