Explain.
The UK has an unlected upper House of Lords.
It has a monarch that technically still has a lot of power, even if it isn't excercised.
London is the primary focus of the country's expenditure and may as well be a city state.
The City of London, an entity unto itself is rife with fraud and corruption on a global scale, and essentially owns our politicians, much like Goldman Sachs basically owns the US government.
> "The UK has an unlected upper House of Lords."
The balance of power has shifted in those 'hundreds of years'. The House of Lords no longer has the same level of power it did 200 years ago. The Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 shifted the bulk of the power for law making to the House of Commons. If you're not familiar with these bills, I recommend taking a look...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_Act_1911
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_Act_1949
> "It has a monarch that technically still has a lot of power, even if it isn't excercised."
The moment the Monarch tries to exercise that power is the moment the Monarch seals their fate, as dissolution of the monarchy would almost inevitably follow soon after. I'd hardly call that 'power'.
> "London is the primary focus of the country's expenditure and may as well be a city state."
I agree that spending in London is disproportionately high compared to the rest of the country.
However, it's worth remembering how big a part of the UK that London is. The population of Greater London is roughly 9.8 million. The population of the UK as a whole is roughly 64.1 million. Therefore, approximately 15% of everyone in the UK lives in London/Greater London. To put that in perspective, that's more people than live in the next 6 largest urban areas combined (Greater Manchester, West Midlands, West Yorkshire, Greater Glasgow, Liverpool, South Hampshire).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_in_the_Uni...
There are signs that UK public spending outside London will be improving. At the moment public spending in the UK is guided by the Barnett formula, which even the author himself admits was a 'terrible mistake'...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnett_formula
> "The City of London, an entity unto itself is rife with fraud and corruption on a global scale, and essentially owns our politicians, much like Goldman Sachs basically owns the US government."
The City of London is rife with fraud and corruption, but that's no argument for the EU, which is equally in bed with big business. The lobbying industry for the EU is massive, second only to the US.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/08/lobbyists-euro...
How do you see the grassroots transitioning the UK voting system for general elections, what power do we have if the MPs don't want it?
Also assuming whitehall will produce less redtape than brussels is probably not going to be true :(