News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX Picks Rocket for First Relaunch by yetihehe on Monday July 18, 2016 @03:35AM (#12113667)
> If they have cracks in things that are designed to go through multiple flights without cracks, and those cracks haven't appeared in testing, that's a failure.

No, it's real world engineering. You can't simulate everything when you're doing something totally new. You need to make tests on real hardware to confirm that your model is good.

Re:SpaceX Picks Rocket for First Relaunch by sgc on Monday July 18, 2016 @07:21AM (#12114400)
Exact. It is not really any different than going from in-house to beta testing in software to get those real world bugs that always come up -- it is a known step of the design process before even starting.
Re:SpaceX Picks Rocket for First Relaunch by hexane360 on Monday July 18, 2016 @01:42PM (#12116711)
Especially aerodynamics. Modeling fluids alone is very hard and intensive, and that's before you model surface interaction, possible ablation, temperature, shock, and all the other forces present in a dynamic situation.

Not doing any x-ray testing would be completely negligent.