Do yourself a favour and read the essay on class linked to elsewhere in this thread: http://siderea.livejournal.com/1260265.html?format=light
The problem is that wealth/income is not normally distributed! It is heavily - heavily! - skewed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM
I would not worry about any family with <250k annual income when thinking about "what do we do about the uneven distribution of income", I would let those people be. They are not the problem. Look at the top 0.01% (see http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21631129...).
Even in the Bay Area (which these two are NOT in), they are making DOUBLE the typical Bay-Area median household.
You can't make DOUBLE the amount of money of the median family and then claim to be "middle class". It just doesn't work that way.
And FYI: there's a reason why there's a ton of anti-gentrification going on in San Francisco. The actual middle-class, who is trying to live on ~$80k combined income in that region, is not able to find a house (let alone the lower-class, who will earn much less than the median)
If that family isn't middle class, what are they then?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_middle_class
$150k is a lower-estimate for this family, they probably beat the $165k to qualify for top 5% household incomes in the country.
High amount of autonomy in their work, advanced degrees (beyond college: masters degree plus continuing education), significantly higher wages than everyone else... yeah, upper-middle class.
Ok, I think we keep talking past each other, because to me, upper middle class is just a subset of middle class. I don't think it's wrong for people who belong to it to describe themselves as middle class, because if you're in the upper middle class, you have a lot more in common with the rest of the middle class, than you have with the upper class.
That's both salaries mother and father combined. You've got to be kidding me if having a takehome income literally TRIPLE the median constitutes "middle class".
Look, I don't even think "middle class" is a meaningful term. Don't ask me.
Despite the name, having to work for a living isn't what puts you in the working class. What you work with, and how you value different types of work and education is what puts you there.
That's utter baloney.
I know people with $150,000 / year combined income who think of themselves as middle class, despite being in the upper 10% of income in this country.