Re:Misuse of Creative Commons-licensed photo leads to public...
by stordoff on Saturday July 16, 2016 @05:09PM
(#12107887)
I can see the other side of it though - (roughly speaking) money changes hands -> definitely a contract, non-monetary licence -> probably a contract. IF they don't use CC-BY-SA images often, it might be cheaper/less risky to just offer a token payment rather than getting their legal team to check the CC licence.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Misuse of Creative Commons-licensed photo leads to public...
by avar on Saturday July 16, 2016 @05:45PM
(#12108002)
Yes it makes perfect sense, not saying it doesn't. Just sharing my experience as a counterpoint to the other people in this thread who are surprised that anyone might ever pay for freely licensed content.