News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snabbdom – A Simple, Modular, Powerful, and Fast Virtual ... by andrewmcwatters on Saturday July 16, 2016 @01:48PM (#12107196)
I'm thoroughly convinced anyone writing a virtual dom library doesn't know how the DOM, nor a renderer for it, actually works internally.
Re:Snabbdom – A Simple, Modular, Powerful, and Fast Virtual ... by eloff on Saturday July 16, 2016 @04:29PM (#12107770)
There are a number of performance advantages to a virtual DOM. That's why React uses a virtual DOM - unless you're also thoroughly convinced you know more than Facebook's engineers. Google the subject a little.
Re:Snabbdom – A Simple, Modular, Powerful, and Fast Virtual ... by andrewmcwatters on Thursday July 28, 2016 @03:03PM (#12182371)
But there aren't, there are performance advantages to reusing Nodes due to the specific way that browsers implement render reflow. If those implementations ever change, or you use React on a browser that doesn't suffer from implementation specific perf issues, you've introduced unnecessary complexity.

This is the type of rhetoric that is repeated without personal knowledge of internals or without understanding why the issue exists to begin with. You're basically saying that tree-based structures are inherently expensive.

Read implementing a browser a little. Read specs a little.

Re:Snabbdom – A Simple, Modular, Powerful, and Fast Virtual ... by caub on Saturday July 16, 2016 @02:07PM (#12107290)
examples of what is wrong?