Re:CloudFlare, We Have a Problem
by dragonwriter on Saturday July 16, 2016 @10:58AM
(#12106525)
Only one part of a DMCA takedown is under penalty of perjury, and it's quite possible to file a knowingly false takedown request without that part being falsified.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
But isn't it the part where you assert in good faith you own the copyright? How do you get around that scenario of a malicious takedown request against a random site?
Re:CloudFlare, We Have a Problem
by dragonwriter on Saturday July 16, 2016 @04:29PM
(#12107772)
It's the part where you asset that you are the owner of the copyright you alleged is being violated. As long as you own copyright on something that's not a problem. The part where you actually allege that particular content uses your work without permission or privilege is not under penalty of perjury.